Abstract
This paper describes a physics-guided Bayesian framework for identifying the milling stability boundary and system parameters through iterative testing. Prior uncertainties for the parameters are identified through physical simulation and literature reviews, without physical testing of the actual milling system. Those uncertainties are then propagated to the stability map using a physics-based stability model, which is used to suggest a test point. The uncertainties are updated based on the new information acquired from the cutting test to form a new probability distribution, called the posterior. Finally, the posterior are compared to measured values for the stability boundary and system parameters to evaluate the approach. Based on experimental observations, the advantages and disadvantages of using a physics-guided model are discussed.
