Abstract
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) are promising devices for the deployment of hydrogen-powered heavy-duty vehicles, providing a higher efficiency for similar driving range and fueling time than the existing ones. However, PEMFCs still encounter durability challenges mainly due to catalyst degradation in the cathode. Mitigating these performance losses requires a better understanding of the degradation mechanisms under heavy-duty accelerated stress tests (ASTs) [1]. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) are key tools for the analysis of Pt and PtCo nanoparticle size, spatial distribution and composition [2]. Electron tomography is also used to determine the rate and type of degradation of catalyst nanoparticles as a function of their position on the carbon support.
In this work, automated data acquisition software, paired with a custom Python code, have been used to study the effect of different accelerated stress tests (ASTs) on nanoparticle coarsening [2]. Figure 1 shows high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)-STEM images and EDS maps comparing the cathodes of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) following an electrocatalyst AST performed under H2/N2 with that of the heavy-duty AST performed under H2/air. We will discuss how AST conditions affect considerably the spatial distribution of the nanoparticles across the electrode between the membrane and microporous layer. Although the median particle size increased more in the MEA aged under the heavy-duty AST, as determined using a high-throughput image analysis, the quantitative EDS measurements demonstrate that the electrocatalyst AST resulted in more Pt and Co dissolution from the cathode, which is another important indicator of electrocatalyst degradation. We will further present the impact of the relative humidity (% RH) on the degradation mechanisms demonstrated using the same approach.
Electron tomography has been used to distinguish the Pt nanoparticles residing on the carbon support surface (exterior) from those within the pore structure (interior) in order to determine the relative stability of interior and exterior nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 2, we will compare the Pt catalyst particle size at the beginning of test (BOT) and end of test (EOT), and discuss the importance of automating the electron tomography workflow, i.e. acquisition, reconstruction, and visualization, to increase sampling and determine the standard deviation of these measurement. The outlook for utilizing low-dose cryo-tomography for limiting damage to the catalyst, support, and especially proton-conducting ionomer will also be discussed [3].
