Abstract
Electrostatic interactions involving proteins depend on not only the ionic charges involved but also their chemical identities. Here we examine the origins of incompletely understood differences in the strength of association of different pairs of monovalent molecular ions that are relevant to protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions. Cationic analogues of the basic amino acid side chains are simulated, along with oxyanionic analogues of cation-exchange ligands and acidic amino acids. Experimentally observed association trends with respect to the cations, but not anions, are captured by a nonpolarizable model. An effective continuum correction to account for electronic polarizability can capture both trends better but at the expense of fidelity to the underlying free energy landscape for ion-pair association. A polarizable model proves decisive in capturing experimentally suggested trends with respect to both cations and anions; critically, the free energy landscape for ion-pair association is itself altered, thus altering configurational sampling.
