Abstract
Protein–protein interactions play a key role in mediating numerous biological functions, with more than half the proteins in living organisms existing as either homo- or hetero-oligomeric assemblies. Protein subunits that form oligomers minimize the free energy of the complex, but exhaustive computational search-based docking methods have not comprehensively addressed the challenge of distinguishing a natively bound complex from non-native forms. Current protein docking approaches address this problem by sampling multiple binding modes in proteins and scoring each mode, with the lowest-energy (or highest scoring) binding mode being regarded as a near-native complex. However, high-scoring modes often match poorly with the true bound form, suggesting a need for improvement of the scoring function. In this study, we propose a scoring function, KFC-E, that accounts for both conservation and coevolution of putative binding hotspot residues at protein–protein interfaces. We tested KFC-E on four benchmark sets of unbound examples and two benchmark sets of bound examples, with the results demonstrating a clear improvement over scores that examine conservation and coevolution across the entire interface.
